Throughout our readings this semester we encountered readings on Sisters In Islam and polygamy and etc. Relevant to this reading is the idea that people practicing Islam interpret the Qu’ran in a way that perpetuates oppression. In other words, Islam is not oppressive, it’s the ways in which people engage with the values written in the Qu’ran that can make Islam oppressive.
Described various times in the reading, there are specific stories that are taken out of context deliberately to suggest that homosexuality is not accepted in Islam. For instance, a story that was ultimately about not approving of violent sexual acts and adultery but was twisted to disapprove of sodomy. Another reason homosexuality is twisted to be unaccepted in Islam is in accordance with norms. For instance, mid-chapter two, Kugle describes how both Christian and Jewish values were not the most receptive to same-sex relationships so in turn, interpretations of the Qu’ran were going against homosexuality. The ways in which public opinion can skew how minority groups are treated in society is quite frightening. Especially when you consider the life-threatening violence and torment these individuals will face as a result of these beliefs or preaching. Further, I have been and continue to be intrigued by the legitimate values of the Qu’ran and the actual practices of Islam. How are the deviations from these preachings mediated? Are they mediated at all? Are the opinions held on gay and gender non-conforming individuals a result of religion or a majorities peer pressure?
